SEC Insider Trading Prevention Checklist

Last updated: 2026-04-09 — ComplianceStack Editorial Team

18 items
Progress 0 of 18 reviewed

The SEC brought 46 insider trading enforcement actions in fiscal year 2023, resulting in 71M+ in disgorgement and penalties. Insider trading investigations typically begin with market surveillance — the SEC's MIDAS system flags abnormal trading patterns before earnings, M&A announcements, or other material events. This checklist covers the 18 controls that the SEC's Division of Enforcement and the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) look for when evaluating whether a company had adequate insider trading prevention procedures in place.

Priority Legend:
● Critical ● High ● Medium ● Ongoing

SEC Compliance Checklist for Insider Trading Prevention

1

Adopt and distribute a written insider trading policy

Critical 2-3 days

Every public company, investment adviser, and broker-dealer should have a written insider trading policy that: defines material nonpublic information (MNPI), specifies who is covered, explains the blackout period, describes the pre-clearance process, and outlines consequences for violations. Distribute annually and obtain signed acknowledgments.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5; SEA Rule 10b5-1
2

Implement a pre-clearance process for Section 16 insiders and designated employees

Critical 2-3 days

Officers, directors, and any employee with access to material nonpublic information should obtain compliance department approval before trading. Pre-clearance requests should be evaluated against: open trading windows, pending announcements, and known MNPI in each requestor's possession. Log every pre-clearance request and outcome.

Exchange Act § 16(a); Rule 10b-5; 10b5-1 safe harbor
3

Establish trading blackout periods around earnings and material announcements

Critical 1-2 days

Standard blackout periods: the quarter closes → blackout begins; earnings released publicly → blackout lifts after 2-3 trading days. Expand blackout to cover any period where the company is aware of material events (M&A, FDA decisions, material contracts). Log every blackout period activation and lifting.

Exchange Act Rule 10b-5; SEC Release 33-10819 (Reg BI related)
4

Review and update Rule 10b5-1 trading plans to comply with 2023 SEC amendments

Critical 2-3 days

The SEC's December 2022 amendments (effective February 2023) require: a 90-day cooling-off period for officers and directors (or next open trading window, if longer), a 30-day cooling-off for other insiders, a limit of one single-trade plan per 12 months, and a representation that the person is not aware of MNPI at plan adoption. Review all existing plans for compliance.

Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 (amended); Release 33-11138
5

Establish an information barrier (Chinese Wall) between departments with MNPI access

Critical 1-2 weeks

Separate investment banking from sales and trading; separate research from proprietary trading; separate M&A advisory from equity capital markets. Information barriers must include: physical separation where possible, access controls on shared systems, review of electronic communications crossing the barrier, and a restricted list monitored by compliance.

Exchange Act § 10(b); FINRA Rule 2241; SEA Rule 10b-5
6

Maintain and monitor a restricted list and a watch list of securities

Critical Ongoing

Restricted list: securities where the firm has MNPI; no trading permitted. Watch list: securities under firm surveillance; compliance has heightened monitoring but trading may be permitted subject to additional review. Update both lists when new MNPI is received or when public disclosure resolves the MNPI.

Exchange Act § 10(b); FINRA Rules 3110, 2241
7

Train all employees on insider trading annually and at onboarding

High Half day per year

Training should cover: definition of MNPI, examples relevant to your industry, the duty to report suspected violations, consequences (personal criminal liability, company liability), and how to submit a pre-clearance request. Document completion. Untrained employees who later trade on MNPI create both personal and firm liability.

Exchange Act § 20A; 15 U.S.C. § 78t-1
8

Monitor personal trading by employees with MNPI access

High Ongoing

Require disclosure of personal brokerage accounts; receive duplicate statements or use a personal trading compliance platform (Schwab Compliance Technologies, ComplySci, etc.). Review trades by employees on the watch list or restricted list. Flag trades that coincide with MNPI events for investigation.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5; Investment Advisers Act § 204A
9

Implement access controls on MNPI-sensitive systems and documents

High 2-3 days

M&A deal rooms, earnings draft systems, and material contract negotiations should have access controlled to need-to-know individuals. Use code names for sensitive transactions. Log access to deal documents. Restrict access to earnings data systems (ERP, finance systems) during the blackout period.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5
10

Establish a tipping policy and train on downstream liability

High 1 day

A tipper who shares MNPI for personal benefit can be criminally liable even if they do not trade personally. Employees must understand that sharing MNPI with family members, friends, or third parties is illegal regardless of whether they receive payment. Include specific examples in annual training.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983); Salman v. United States (2016)
11

Review communications during sensitive transaction periods for inadvertent MNPI leaks

High Ongoing

During M&A negotiations, earn-out discussions, or material contract negotiations, review email traffic, Slack/Teams messages, and phone logs of deal team members for inadvertent leaks or unusual personal trading. Assign a compliance attorney to monitor communications during high-risk periods.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5
12

Adopt a Regulation FD compliance policy and train IR teams

High 2 days

Selective disclosure of MNPI to analysts, institutional investors, or shareholders triggers Reg FD. All material information must be disclosed simultaneously to the public. Train IR teams to avoid answering analyst questions with material guidance during quiet periods. Script earnings calls and investor presentations.

Exchange Act Rules 100-103 (Regulation FD)
13

Create a process for employees to report suspected insider trading violations

High 1 day

Employees who witness colleagues trading on MNPI or receiving tips should have a confidential channel to report it (ethics hotline, compliance department). The company's response to internal reports affects the SEC's view of the compliance culture. Protect reporters from retaliation.

Dodd-Frank Act § 922; Exchange Act § 21F (whistleblower)
14

Audit Section 16 insider filings for accuracy and timeliness

Medium Ongoing

Review all Form 4 filings for accuracy against broker confirmations. Common errors: failure to report convertible instrument exercises, incorrect transaction codes, missed derivative transactions. Set up calendar alerts for each insider's known grant and vesting dates to proactively file Forms 4.

Exchange Act § 16(a); Rules 16a-1 through 16a-11
15

Review hedging and pledging activity by insiders

Medium 1-2 days

Hedging transactions that remove economic risk from stock ownership (puts, zero-cost collars, prepaid variable forwards) may reduce alignment with shareholder interests. SEC rules require disclosure of hedging policies in the proxy. Many companies prohibit insider hedging entirely. Pledging shares as loan collateral also requires disclosure.

Exchange Act Rule 16c-4; Reg S-K Item 407(i)
16

Document MNPI received from third parties (acquisition targets, partner companies)

Medium Ongoing

When the company receives MNPI from a target company during due diligence or from a partner during contract negotiations, document the receipt, restrict access, and place the counterparty's securities on the restricted list. Failure to restrict trading after receiving third-party MNPI is as serious as trading on internally generated MNPI.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5; Misappropriation theory (United States v. O'Hagan)
17

Conduct a periodic review of the insider trading prevention program

Medium 1-2 days per year

At least annually, review the insider trading policy, blackout period logs, pre-clearance records, employee trading reports, and any incidents. Compare against current enforcement trends and SEC guidance. Update the program for new business lines, new types of MNPI, and regulatory changes.

Exchange Act § 10(b); Rule 10b-5; FINRA Rule 3120
18

Prepare a response playbook for SEC insider trading inquiries

Medium 2 days

If the SEC requests trading records, communications, or witness testimony in connection with an insider trading investigation, having a response playbook reduces reaction time and minimizes additional exposure. Include: legal hold procedures, document collection workflow, outside counsel contact list, and employee communication templates.

Exchange Act § 21(a); SFAA § 1001 (obstruction)

See How Your Insider Trading Prevention Scores on SEC

Run a free gap analysis to find out which items you have covered and where the risks are.

Gap Analyzer →   Training Tracker →

Common Mistakes That Trigger Enforcement

Adopting a Rule 10b5-1 plan while aware of MNPI
A 10b5-1 plan adopted while the insider is aware of MNPI provides no safe harbor. The SEC's enforcement division has brought cases against insiders who established plans days before material announcements with the plan first trade scheduled after the announcement.
Assuming casual tip-sharing with family does not count as insider trading
In Salman v. United States (2016), the Supreme Court confirmed that tipping a family member constitutes insider trading if the tipper expected the recipient to trade. The personal benefit requirement is satisfied by the mere fact of giving a gift to a trading relative.
Failing to update the restricted list promptly when MNPI is received
A two-hour gap between receiving MNPI and updating the restricted list is enough time for an employee with system access to trade. Restricted list updates should be instantaneous upon confirmation of MNPI receipt.
Using 10b5-1 plan terminations to avoid planned trades when MNPI emerges
Strategic termination of 10b5-1 plans shortly before negative announcements — followed by re-establishment after the announcement — has been scrutinized as evidence of insider awareness. The SEC's 2022 amendments added disclosure requirements for plan terminations precisely to address this pattern.
Providing updated earnings guidance to analysts before a public announcement
Revised guidance — even delivered to a single analyst — is material information that triggers Reg FD if not simultaneously disclosed. Multiple SEC enforcement actions have arisen from post-earnings-call one-on-one conversations with analysts where the company provided clarifying guidance not available to the public.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a company be held criminally liable for an employee's insider trading?

Yes. Companies can face criminal liability under respondeat superior — the company is liable for employees' criminal acts committed within the scope of employment and at least partly for the benefit of the company. Prosecutors weigh whether the company had adequate compliance procedures in place. Strong insider trading controls and genuine enforcement culture are the primary defenses to corporate criminal liability.

What qualifies as "material" information for insider trading purposes?

Information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision. Courts use a probability/magnitude test: the probability the event will occur, multiplied by the magnitude of the impact on share price. Typical examples: earnings substantially above or below consensus, merger or acquisition decisions, FDA drug approval or rejection, major litigation settlements, and loss of a major customer.

Do Rule 10b5-1 plans provide complete protection from insider trading enforcement?

No. A 10b5-1 plan provides an affirmative defense if it was adopted in good faith at a time when the insider was unaware of MNPI, and if trading occurred pursuant to the plan without modification. The SEC has challenged plans where: the plan was adopted while the insider possessed MNPI, the insider modified the plan to accelerate or decelerate trades around announcements, or the pattern of plan establishment and cancellation suggests manipulation.

✉ Save This Checklist

Enter your email and we'll send you a clean copy — plus updates when requirements change.

We also offer a free personalized gap analysis for your specific situation.

Related Resources