SOX Section 302 vs Section 906: What CEOs and CFOs Need to Know
SOX requires both the CEO and CFO to personally certify the accuracy of financial reports. Two sections cover these certifications: Section 302 (civil liability) and Section 906 (criminal liability). Both appear in every 10-K and 10-Q filing.
Key Differences
- Section 302 is the detailed civil certification — it's what drives the quarterly Disclosure Committee process, ICFR testing, and sub-certifications down the management chain. Section 906 is a brief criminal overlay: if you knowingly certify a false filing, you face up to 10 years; willfully, up to 20 years.
Who Must Comply with Both
- CEOs and CFOs of all SEC-registered public companies
- Any executive signing periodic SEC filings
Common Questions
Can a CEO delegate the Section 302 certification?
No. The CEO and CFO must personally certify. They can't delegate to a General Counsel or controller. However, they typically receive sub-certifications from business unit leaders to support their certification.
Has anyone been prosecuted under Section 906?
Yes, though prosecutions are rare. The criminal standard (knowingly and willfully) is high. Most SOX enforcement actions are civil, brought by the SEC under Section 302.
What triggers a SOX restatement?
Material misstatements in previously filed financial statements trigger restatements. The SEC may then investigate whether the 302/906 certifications were accurate when made.
More Framework Comparisons
- HIPAA vs GDPR: What US Companies Need to Know
- HIPAA vs HITRUST: Key Differences for Healthcare Organizations
- SOX vs SOC 2: Key Differences Every Finance and Tech Leader Should Know
- GDPR vs CCPA: Side-by-Side Comparison for 2026
- Best Free HIPAA Risk Assessment Tools in 2026
- ComplianceStack vs Vanta: Which Compliance Tool Is Right for You?
- View all comparisons →