FDA Import Violations: FSVP Enforcement, Import Alerts, and Detention

Last updated: 2026-04-06 — ComplianceStack Editorial Team

The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) rule under FSMA (21 CFR Part 1, Subpart L) requires every importer of food into the United States to verify that their foreign suppliers produce food meeting U.S. safety standards. Importers must identify and evaluate known or reasonably foreseeable hazards, evaluate the foreign supplier's performance and the risk posed by the food, conduct verification activities (on-site audits, sampling, records review), and take corrective actions when deficiencies are found. FDA dramatically escalated FSVP enforcement in 2023–2025, issuing a wave of warning letters to importers operating with zero FSVP documentation. The enforcement escalation path: warning letter → re-inspection fees ($318–$373/hour) → placement on import alert → detention without physical examination (DWPE). Once on an import alert, every shipment from that importer is detained at the border until the importer demonstrates compliance.

Regulatory Authority: 21 CFR Part 1, Subpart L (FSVP Requirements); 21 USC 381 (Imports and Exports); 21 USC 384a (FSVP); Import Alert 99-41 (FSVP Violations); 21 USC 333 (Criminal Penalties); 18 USC 545 (Smuggling); FSMA Sections 301, 303; Federal Register 89 FR 61430 (FY2025 FSMA Fee Rates)

Penalty Tier Breakdown

Warning Letter — No FSVP Program in Place

No direct fine — triggers re-inspection fees ($318–$373/hour FY2025) and import alert placement risk
Annual max: Re-inspection fees uncapped; each hour of follow-up inspection billed at published rates

FDA issues warning letters to importers found to have no FSVP or an inadequate FSVP during inspection. Common findings: no hazard analysis for imported foods, no supplier evaluation and approval, no verification activities conducted, and no corrective action procedures. FDA inspected FSVP compliance at an accelerating rate through 2023–2025, with particular focus on high-risk categories including spices, seafood, fresh produce, and mushrooms. Warning letters explicitly state that continued failure will result in refusal of admission and placement on import alert.

Example: In October 2024, FDA issued warning letters to Paso Real Produce LLC (avocados and limes importer) for having zero FSVP documentation, and to Future Best Trading Inc. after Listeria monocytogenes was found in imported Enoki mushrooms and the company had no supplier verification program.

Import Alert — Detention Without Physical Examination (DWPE)

All shipments from the importer/country/product combination detained at port of entry without physical examination
Annual max: Indefinite — remains in effect until importer demonstrates compliance and FDA removes the alert

Import alerts authorize FDA field offices to detain food shipments without physical examination (DWPE) when there is evidence that the product may be adulterated or misbranded. Import Alert 99-41 covers FSVP violations specifically. Once an importer is placed on an alert, every shipment matching the alert criteria is automatically detained at the border. The importer bears the burden of demonstrating that their products comply with U.S. requirements before FDA will release the shipment. Import alerts effectively block market access — products sit at the port at the importer's expense until released or destroyed.

Example: FDA maintains Import Alert 99-41 for detention of food products from importers not in compliance with FSVP. An importer in Los Angeles that receives a warning letter for FSVP violations and fails to correct them within the stated timeframe is placed on the alert. Every subsequent container of food arriving at any U.S. port from that importer is automatically detained.

Refusal of Admission — Product Blocked from U.S. Market

Product must be exported, destroyed, or reconditioned at importer's expense; FDA does not compensate for refused shipments
Annual max: No cap — each refused shipment is a separate loss. Costs include storage, re-export, and destruction fees

Under Section 801 of the FD&C Act (21 USC 381), FDA can refuse admission to any food that appears to be adulterated, misbranded, or in violation of FSMA requirements. Refused products must be exported within 90 days or destroyed under FDA supervision. The importer bears all costs — storage, re-export freight, destruction fees, and any associated penalties. Repeated refusals strengthen FDA's case for broader enforcement including import alerts covering additional products from the same supplier or country of origin. Refusal of admission data is publicly available on FDA's Import Refusal Reports.

Example: A spice importer's shipment of ground cinnamon from a foreign supplier is refused admission after FDA sampling detects lead contamination above action levels. The importer must pay port storage fees, arrange destruction or re-export, and the supplier is flagged for future screening.

Criminal Prosecution — Knowing Importation of Adulterated Food

Misdemeanor: up to $1,000 + 1 year; Felony (intent to defraud): up to $10,000 + 3 years; Smuggling: up to $250,000 + 10 years
Annual max: Civil money penalties up to $690,000 per individual, $7,000,000 per corporation per proceeding

Importers who knowingly introduce adulterated or misbranded food into U.S. commerce face criminal prosecution under 21 USC 333. Intent to defraud or mislead elevates the charge to a felony. If food is smuggled into the U.S. to avoid FDA inspection (through misrepresentation of contents, use of unauthorized ports, or falsification of entry documents), additional federal smuggling charges under 18 USC 545 apply with penalties up to $250,000 and 10 years imprisonment. A veterinary drug distributor was ordered to pay more than $23 million in criminal fines and forfeitures in May 2024 after pleading guilty to distributing misbranded prescription products — the third settlement in a string of cases totaling over $86 million.

Example: In May 2024, a veterinary drug distributor was ordered to pay more than $23 million in criminal fines and forfeitures after pleading guilty to distributing misbranded imported prescription veterinary drugs. This followed a $52 million settlement in 2020 and an $11 million settlement in 2023 involving the same distribution network.

How Penalties Are Calculated

FDA evaluates import violations through a risk-based framework. Import alerts are triggered by: (1) a pattern of violations from a specific importer, supplier, or country; (2) laboratory findings of contamination or adulteration in sampled products; (3) failure to comply with FSVP requirements during inspection; or (4) information from foreign government partners about food safety issues. FSVP inspection triggers include: routine surveillance, for-cause inspections based on adverse findings, and follow-up inspections after warning letters. Re-inspection fees for FSVP follow-up are $318/hour domestic or $373/hour for foreign travel (FY2025). Import alerts are publicly posted on FDA's Import Alert Library and can cover individual firms, products from a specific country, or entire product categories from regions with systemic food safety problems. The importer bears the burden of proof to demonstrate compliance and secure removal from an import alert — FDA does not automatically remove alerts after a fixed period.

Recent Enforcement Actions

2024 — HH Fresh Trading Corp (Los Angeles, California)
No adequate FSVP for imported fresh Enoki mushrooms; FDA laboratory found Listeria monocytogenes in imported product sample; inspection from February–March 2024 revealed absence of hazard analysis, supplier evaluation, and verification activities
Penalty: Warning letter issued July 17, 2024. Company warned that continued FSVP non-compliance could result in detention without physical examination and refusal of admission for all imported food products.
Source: FDA Warning Letter, July 2024; Food Safety News
2024 — Paso Real Produce LLC and Future Best Trading Inc.
Complete absence of FSVP documentation; Paso Real (avocados/limes) had no FSVP for any imported products; Future Best (Enoki mushrooms) had no supplier verification despite positive Listeria finding in imported product
Penalty: Warning letters issued October 1 and October 10, 2024 respectively. Both warned of import alert placement and DWPE for continued non-compliance.
Source: FDA Warning Letters, October 2024; National Law Review
2025 — Talla Imports LLC (Minnesota) and Premium Fresh Growers LLC (Texas)
Talla Imports: no FSVP developed or maintained for any imported foods including chocolate toffee, gingerbread cookies, and fruit candy sticks from Sweden. Premium Fresh Growers: no FSVP for imported limes, cilantro, and carrots despite failing a prior 2023 inspection
Penalty: Warning letters issued January 2025 (Talla) and December 2024 (Premium Fresh Growers). Premium Fresh flagged as repeat violator with escalated enforcement risk. Both warned of DWPE placement.
Source: FDA Warning Letters, December 2024 and January 2025; Food Safety News
2024 — Veterinary Drug Distribution Network (Criminal — Multi-Year Case)
Distribution of misbranded prescription veterinary drugs imported without proper FDA authorization; third in a series of related cases involving the same distribution network
Penalty: $23 million in criminal fines and forfeitures (May 2024). Combined with prior settlements: $52M (2020) and $11M (2023) — total exceeding $86 million across three cases in the same network.
Source: DOJ Press Release, May 2024; 2024 FDA Enforcement Review, Ropes & Gray LLP

Understand Your FDA/FSMA Penalty Exposure

Use ComplianceStack's free tools to identify gaps before regulators do.

Take the Quiz →   Gap Analyzer →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is detention without physical examination (DWPE)?

DWPE means FDA field offices can detain imported food shipments at the port of entry without physically inspecting or sampling them, based solely on the import alert listing. The shipment is held until the importer provides evidence that the product complies with U.S. requirements — documentation of supplier verification, third-party lab results, or proof that the violation has been corrected. DWPE shifts the burden of proof from FDA (normally required to demonstrate a violation) to the importer (required to demonstrate compliance). Products detained under DWPE sit at the port at the importer's expense. If the importer cannot provide adequate evidence of compliance, the product is refused admission and must be exported or destroyed within 90 days.

How do I get removed from an FDA import alert?

Removal from an import alert requires the importer to demonstrate that the conditions that led to the alert have been corrected. For FSVP-related alerts (Import Alert 99-41), this typically means: (1) developing and implementing a compliant FSVP program, (2) providing documentation of hazard analysis, supplier evaluation, and verification activities, (3) submitting evidence of corrective actions for all cited deficiencies, and (4) requesting that FDA conduct a follow-up inspection to verify compliance. FDA reviews the submission and may conduct a re-inspection before removing the firm from the alert. There is no guaranteed timeline — removal depends on the adequacy of the importer's documentation and FDA's inspection schedule. Some firms remain on import alerts for years.

Does every food importer need an FSVP?

Almost every food importer needs an FSVP. The rule applies to importers of food for humans and animals, with limited exemptions: (1) food imported for research or personal consumption; (2) food transshipped through the U.S. (not entering U.S. commerce); (3) juice, seafood, and low-acid canned food subject to specific HACCP regulations (though importers still need some verification); (4) food imported from a supplier in a country whose food safety system FDA has officially recognized as comparable. Very small importers (below $1M in sales of human food, below $2.5M in animal food) have modified FSVP requirements but are not fully exempt. If you import food into the U.S. for sale, you almost certainly need an FSVP.

More FDA/FSMA Resources